, along with hundreds of other of my online newspapers and publications. My life is focused on my church, my spiritual and healing work. I am selling individual blogs (online magazine publications), all blogs, individually to the highest bidder. If you Like one of my online magazines, my publications, my intellectual property, and want to make me an offer, email me at . This FOR Sale posted by Reverend Crystal Cox, Bringing Back Goddess Church.

Also Note, if you wish to hire me to do any online marketing or investigative blogging work use that same email.

Friday, March 18, 2016

Ted Bernstein, via his attorney Alan Rose, is retaliating against a Creditor of the Simon Bernstein estate. Take a Look.

Tuesday, March 15, 2016

Motion For Protective Order FiIed by Feaman on behalf of William Stansbury; Judge John Phillips. Attorney Alan Rose, Ted Bernstein, Subpoena's and more

Read this Folks, and every motion in the Simon Bernstein Estate Case. It clearly shows the MASSIVE corruption in the Florida Probate Courts and which judges and which attorneys are involved in this culture of corruption.

Below is a filing for a Protective Order, and has Subpoena's from Ted Bernstein's AGGRESSIVE above the law attorney Alan Rose, who loves to name me, Crystal Cox in his court orders. Kind of makes me feel all warm and fuzzy that he thinks of me so much and so often.

Oh and just for the ol' record whatever that may be, I have never spoke to a William Stansbury, never met him, read his name in court documents, never emailed him nor been emailed by him but WOW Alan Rose must be scared that his illegal activities are soon to be VERY CLEAR TO ALL. SO he is throwing another FIT by way of huff and puff court filings.

Read Below

Mulrooney Venable search, Bank of America Concord California

Visitor Analysis & System Spec
Search Referral:
Host Name:Browser:IE 11.0
IP Address: — [Label IP Address]Operating System:Win7
Location:Concord, California, United StatesResolution:1920x1080
Returning Visits:0Javascript:Enabled
Visit Length:Not ApplicableISP:Bank Of America

Navigation Path

15 Mar13:07:12

Judge John Robert Blakey Order; "Based on the evidence in the record, and “construing all facts and reasonable inferences in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party,” the Court finds that there are genuine issues of material fact as to whether the Trust was executed and, if so, upon what terms. There remains a triable issue of fact such that a “reasonable jury could return a verdict for the non-moving party,”

MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order Signed 
by the Honorable John Robert Blakey on 3/15/2016.

Summary Judgement for Plaintiff DENIED, Proceed to Trial;

"Here, there is a genuine dispute of fact concerning the existence of the Trust
and its terms. To establish the existence of the Trust, Plaintiffs rely primarily on
testimony from Ted Bernstein and David Simon. According to that testimony,
Simon Bernstein executed the trust documents as set out in Plaintiffs’ Exhibits 15
and 16. However, the testimony of David Simon and Ted Bernstein, along with the
testimony of the other Plaintiffs, is barred by the Illinois Dead Man’s Act to the
extent it relates to conversations with the deceased or to any events which took
place in the presence of the deceased. See 735 ILCS 5/8-201.1 This dramatically
limits the testimony upon which Plaintiffs may rely in support of their motion, and
leaves the Court without any direct testimony describing the Trust’s creation."

In addition to testimony, Plaintiffs rely on a series of documents purporting
to show that the Trust was created. As mentioned above, Plaintiffs offer Exhibits
15 and 16 as unexecuted versions of the Trust. Yet those documents offer Plaintiffs
little support in the absence of the testimony from David Simon and Ted Bernstein
describing how some form of those exhibits was executed by Simon Bernstein. In
addition to Exhibits 15 and 16, Plaintiffs offer the following:

• Ex. 19 – A 6/21/95 IRS Form SS-4 “Application for Employer Identification
Number” on behalf of the “Simon Bernstein Irrevocable Insurance Trust.”
The Form SS-4 purports to be signed by Shirley Bernstein, Simon’s wife.
It is unclear from the face of the document whether it was submitted to or
approved by the IRS.

    1. There is an exception to the Dead Man’s Act that reads: “If any person testifies on behalf of the
representative to any conversation with the deceased . . . or to any event which took place in the
presence of the deceased . . . any adverse party or interested person, if otherwise competent, may
testify concerning the same conversation or event.” This exception does not apply to the testimony
cited by the Intervenor here because that testimony was given by Ted Bernstein and David Simon on
behalf of the Plaintiffs. It was not given on behalf of the estate’s representative. The Intervenor
merely cited to Plaintiffs’ evidence as a way of showing that the resolution of this matter would
involve credibility determinations with regard to Plaintiffs’ witnesses.

• Ex. 18 – An 8/8/95 “Request for Service” asking to transfer the ownership
of Simon Bernstein’s life insurance policy to the “Simon Bernstein
Irrevocable Insurance Trust dtd 6/21/1995.” This document refers to
“ownership” of the policy, and does not affect the policy’s beneficiaries.

• Exhibit 4 – An “Employee Death Benefit Plan and Trust . . . Beneficiary
Designation” in which Simon Bernstein designated the “Simon Bernstein
Irrevocable Insurance Trust” as the beneficiary to receive his death
benefits. Note that this document does not refer to the Trust at issue
here, the “Simon Bernstein Irrevocable Insurance Trust dated 6/21/95.” It
is unclear from the record if that was an oversight, or was intentionally
done to refer to a distinct trust. This document is dated 8/26/1995.

• Exhibit 8 – An 11/7/95 “Request Letter” asking to change the successor
beneficiary of Simon Bernstein’s life insurance policy to the “Simon
Bernstein Irrevocable Insurance Trust Dated June 21, 1995.” This
document includes a response from the insurance company stating that
the “Simon Bernstein Ins. Trust” had been named a contingent

• Exhibit 36 – A 4/23/2010 letter from Heritage Union Life Insurance to
Simon Bernstein that lists the contingent beneficiary of Simon Bernstein’s
life insurance policy as “Simon Bernstein Trust, N.A.” However, the
insurance company’s representative explained that no one had ever
submitted a change of beneficiary request designating “Simon Bernstein
Trust, N.A.” as a beneficiary of the policy. That representative explained,
without apparent firsthand knowledge, that he thought that the “Simon
Bernstein Trust, N.A.” name was used by mistake by an employee of the
insurance company. Don Sanders Aff. at ¶¶ 69-71.

While the above sources do provide some evidence that the Trust was created,
as Plaintiffs contend, that evidence is far from dispositive of the issue. In fact, the
Intervenor has presented argument and evidence casting material doubt on
whether: (1) the Trust was actually created; and (2) the terms of the Trust are as
explained by Plaintiffs. The Intervenor argues as follows:

• The results and timing of the Plaintiffs search for the Trust raise doubts
about their version of events. Plaintiffs claim that David Simon found
both a hard copy and an electronic version of the Trust in his office. David
Simon has offered testimony here that he aided Simon Bernstein in
creating the Trust, and then kept both versions of the unexecuted Trust.

However, David Simon’s search for the Trust documents occurred approximately a year after Simon Bernstein had died. Almost a year earlier, immediately after Simon Bernstein’s death, the family had conducted an “exhaustive search” for the Trust, and none was found.

Between the two searches, the Bernstein siblings and their former
attorney exchanged many emails addressing how best to obtain the
insurance proceeds. Intervenor’s Ex. A, Dep. Exs. 1-5, 8-18. Many of the
emails reference the inability to locate the Trust document. Id. David
Simon was a participant in those emails, but he did not relate a
recollection of the critical facts from his affidavit regarding his memory of
Simon Bernstein executing the Trust. Nor did those emails cause David
Simon to search his own office for the missing documents. That search did
not occur until after David Simon’s brother (Adam Simon) and his firm
were retained as counsel in this matter.

• In the course of their attempts to obtain the policy proceeds, the Bernstein
siblings discussed using a different trust that had been established by
Simon Bernstein – the “2000 Trust.” Intervenor’s Ex. A at 37:4-18; 48:21-
49:19; Dep. Ex. 1. That option was rejected because Pam Simon was not
included as a beneficiary of that trust. Id. The 2000 Trust is important,
however, in that it identifies the proceeds of the policy at issue here as an
asset of that trust. Intervenor’s Ex. A, Dep. Ex. 23 at Schedule A. The
2000 Trust does not refer to an alleged 1995 trust, which the 2000 trust
would have superseded.

• The original complaint in this matter does not refer to a written trust.
Despite David Simon’s statement that he recalls having created the trust
on his own computer and having seen it after execution, the original
Complaint in this matter makes no reference to the execution of a written
trust. Instead, it refers only to the existence of a “common law trust.” [1].
It makes no mention of the trust documents from Exhibits 15 and 16.

• Plaintiffs have offered testimony that, when Simon Bernstein took his
trust to be executed at his law firm (then Hopkins & Sutter), the firm
changed the identity of the successor trustee. This implies that the firm
would have had an electronic version of the Trust, and possibly a hard
copy. David Simon testified that the firm was contacted to see if it had a
copy of the executed trust and did not; but David Simon could not recall
who contacted the firm, which attorneys were contacted, or if he himself
reached out to the firm at all. Intervenor’s Ex. B at 44:12-45:15; 46:22-

David Simon also testified that when Simon Bernstein returned from
executing the Trust he helped Mr. Bernstein prepare documents to be
submitted to the insurance company in order to give effect to the Trust.

He also testified that he would have expected the insurance company to retain copies. 

David Simon does not remember any details about who contacted the insurance company. But it is clear that the company retained no copies of documents relevant to the Trust. Intervenor’s Ex. B
at 43:10-44:2.

• The purported trust documents, Exhibit 15 and 16, contain
inconsistencies as to who would serve as the trustee.

Exhibit 16 lists the potential trustees as “Shirley,” “David,” and an illegible name. It then
lists the successor trustees as “Pam, Ted.” Exhibit 15 lists Shirley as the trustee, and David B. Simon as the successor trustee. However, when the Trust first made a claim to the insurance company, it represented that an attorney by the name of Spallina was the trustee. Intervenor’s Ex. B at
59:13-60:3; 81:15-83:12.

Despite all of this, in the current proceeding
the Plaintiffs claim that Ted Bernstein is the trustee.

Based on the evidence in the record, and “construing all facts and reasonable
inferences in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party,” the Court finds that
there are genuine issues of material fact as to whether the Trust was executed and,
if so, upon what terms. There remains a triable issue of fact such that a “reasonable
jury could return a verdict for the non-moving party,” Liberty Lobby, 477 U.S. at
255, and therefore summary judgment is inappropriate. Plaintiffs’ motion is denied
with regard to Count II.


Dated: March 15, 2016
Judge John Robert Blakey
United States District Court

Source and to Read Order

Judge John Robert Blakey Court Illinois; Heritage Life Insurance / Bernstein Case. Mitch Huhem Death, Judge David French, Judge Martin Colin, attorney Alan Rose, Deborah Huhem, Ted and Deborah Bernstein, attorney Laurence Pino and more.

Status Hearing Memorandum

"As this Court can note, Mitch Huhem was referenced in my Petition for Injunction in Paragraphs 146-153 starting with a conversation I had with one Leilani Ochoada on Feb. 18th, 2016 who knew that I was bringing the information she provided into this Federal Court and other Federal
and state authorities as of that date where Ms. Ochoada had provided information showing
Orlando attorney Laurence Pino, alleged “friend” of Mitch Huhem, had been involved in falsely
filing Articles of Incorporation for a Lion’s Head Land Trust Inc. falsely using Leilani Ochoada’s
name allegedly to hide from the public the name of Mitch Huhem who was allegedly taking the
property in a Sale by Ted Bernstein and his attorney Alan Rose.

The information by the family further provides that Debra Huhem, wife of Mitch Huhem, waited
some approximately 16-24 Hours until Wednesday, February 24, 2016 on the same day I, Eliot
I. Bernstein, actually filed Electronically the referenced Petition naming Mitch Huhem and
Laurence Pino, before Debra Huhem Called ANY blood relative of Mitch Huhem to report the
Death and then upon doing so invited one of the family members to the Intra-Coastal Home of
Ted and Debbie Bernstein, both who were involved in the underlying transaction about to
be exposed in this Federal court the next day.

It is further understood that No PBSO members had contacted ANY of the blood relatives of Mitch Huhem by this point and the wife Debra Huhem was using Mitch’s cell-phone in the days after which may have Evidence of his interactions with Ted Bernstein and others for the alleged “business meeting” that didn’t occur where Mitch Huhem ends up dead instead.

On the Wednesday, Feb. 24, 2016, the day I filed Electronically in this Court on the Petition for
Injunction, the family member allegedly found out from Debra Huhem that her blood relative
Mitch Huhem was allegedly found the day before by the PBSO with such gruesome gunshot
wounds to the head the Wife did not see the body while TED BERNSTEIN was claiming on
Wed, Feb. 24, 2016 at his IntraCoastal home that he was “excited” to see Mitch Huhem on the
morning he allegedly went “missing” as Ted and Mitch were allegedly starting “a new business
together” but then Mitch allegedly didn’t show up.

Yet, Ted Bernstein’s attorney certainly did not Notify this Court on Feb. 25, 2016 that a Dead
body had been found at one of the very places I was seeking to Enjoin the Loss of Evidence
and Order the preservation of evidence and assets, nor in the Florida Probate Court
proceeding later the same day with Judge Phillips where neither Attorney Alan Rose nor his
Client Ted Bernstein had informed Judge Phillips about a Dead body at the St. Andrew’s Home
that I had just sought to enjoin and prevent the Loss of evidence and Order the preservation of
evidence and assets.

Upon information and belief from the confidential family members of Mitch Huhem, allegedly the
PBSO had not spoken to Ted Bernstein about Mitch Huhem’s Death as of over 15 days later
March, 10, 2016 where Mitch was allegedly “meeting” with Ted Bernstein on the day of this

Likewise, the PBSO had allegedly not interviewed Laurence Pino, the Orlando attorney friend of
Mitch Huhem allegedly involved in the false set up of Lion’s Head Land Trust according to
Leilani Ochoada as of the time Debra Huhem brought a Petition to State Court Judge David
French being represented by Laurence Pino in a Petition to take control of the Body for
Cremation where the Mitch Huhem blood relative family had evidence that Mitch Huhem had
purchased a Burial Plot in Utah, thus presently letting Debra Huhem destroy all evidence while
the Case is allegedly “Open” with the PBSO. 

Judge David French is the Florida Probate Judge who was actually Assigned to the Simon Bernstein Estate case at the time of May 2013 when Eliot I. Bernstein first filed his Emergency Motion to Freeze Assets and the Cases based upon Discovering Fraud in the Court Of Judge Martin Colin involving Ted Bernstein’s other business partner attorneys Tescher and Spallina where both Robert
Spallina and their paralegal Kimberly Moran have already admitted to frauds in the case.

Yet, as previously shown to this Court, Judge Colin “stepped over” into the Simon Bernstein
Estate case of Judge David French, Denied my May 2013 Emergency Petition in both Shirley
and Simon’s case, took over Simon’s case where I had just exposed fraud in Judge Colin’s
court, allowed Tescher and Spallina to remain in the case and with all Original files until Feb.
2014, some 8 months later and that alleged “Trustee” Ted Bernstein even upon learning of the fraud by my May 2013 Petition and the ultimate Admissions by Spallina and Tescher has still never taken any action to validate or question Tescher and Spallina and to the contrary, have
continued to “work with” at least Robert Spallina as a “friendly” Witness in Florida proceedings
where SEC Consent Orders are violated by the Testimony and no party to my knowledge but
myself has reported this to authorities.

Further, where it was shown in the recent Petition for Injunction by the Palm Beach Post Investigation that Judges Colin and French are socially very close.

From the same confidential Huhem family sources it has been Discovered that at least one
Simon Bernstein Medical record was found with Mitch Huhem’s possessions in the upstairs of
the St. Andrew’s home and reports of Boxes upon Boxes at the home are present as well, yet
the sources indicate Debra Huhem has been left to “clean up and clear out” all the evidence at
the Scene of the Death and in general where Pictorial evidence at the Blood scene by the family
could lead a lay person to question the “official” story thus far which has been suggested to be a
“suicide” with No Suicide note allegedly found and with the PBSO not even interviewing Ted
Bernstein who was supposed to be meeting with Mitch Huhem on the morning of Tuesday, Feb.
23, 2016 for a “business meeting” when it is known Leilani Ochoada was in contact with
Laurence Pino and Leilani Ochoada knew these matters were going to federal authorities and
into federal court. "

Source of the Above Motion and to Read Full Document

Monday, March 14, 2016

Is the Palm Beach County Sheriff Detectives, the FBI, the DOJ, and all those detectives and authorities supposedly investigating the Death of Simon Bernstein and now of Mitch Huhem actually investigating, questioning, looking into this stuff at all?

a Few Questions:

1. Why hasn't the PBSO questioned the person Mitch Huhem allegedly was supposed to be Meeting with on the morning of Tuesday Feb. 22nd 2016 being Ted Bernstein as of March 10th, 2016?

2. Why hasn't PBSO questioned the man who claims he had an appointment to work out with Mitch Huhem the night he died?

3. Why hasn't PBSO questioned Laurence Pino as to why he created a fake LLC, and why he seems to be in HUGE financial business with Deborah Huhem.

4. Why is PBSO so quick to call it a Suicide but the authorities don't even question the person was supposed to be having a Business Meeting with (Ted Bernstein, allegedly)? Or even consider Mitch Huhem's death to be a murder and NOT a suicide?

5. Why did Mitch Huhem's wife Debra Huhem Not Call ANY of Mitch's Actual Family for nearly 24 HOURS After Mitch was allegedly first discovered Missing? Was he missing? Why can't the family see the body or the crime scene? Was there really a death?

6. Where was Debra Huhem during the time that Mitch Huhem allegedly killed himself ?  Was she "hanging out" at Ted and Debbie Bernstein's?

7. Why has Ted Bernstein alledgedly not talked to the PBSO yet and his friend and business partner, Mitch Huhem, was found dead in Ted Bernstein's father's garage? Where a few years before, Ted, himself called the PBSO claiming his father Simon Bernstein was murdered while living in that very home at 7020 Lions Head Lane Boca Raton Florida.

8. What about Laurence Pino?  When was he questioned by the PBSO? Was he?

9. If it is an Open investigation, why didn't the PBSO notify Judge David French the Investigation was Open when a Hearing came up to determine who has proper authority to make decisions for Mitch's Estate, Mitch Huhem's body and burial, when his so called "friend" attorney Laurence Pino who allegedly changed Mitch Huhem's Will and was involved in setting up the fraudulently filed Lions Head Land Trust Inc., witnessed by attorney Alan Rose of Mrachek Law firm and was a Witness who should be questioned by authorities, not acting as an attorney for Dehborah Huhem in a major conflict of interest in David French's court?

10. Why hasn't Attorney Alan Rose been questioned by the PBSO, as he witnessed the signature of the Lions Head Land Trust Inc., that took title to the property and was a fraudulent corporation of which he new and conspired to create and take title, allegedly?

Much more on this and action you can take to demand justice, coming soon.

Contact the Department of Justice, the FBI, the Palm County Sheriff Office, the Florida Attorney General, the Florida Governor, and more. Here are a few contacts for now.

Demand that the Florida probate court Judges, attorneys and co-conspirators have a full investigation at every level. Demand that the Mitch Huhem death be investigated, reported on and that full disclosure of all cases, deaths, and cover ups related to 7020 Lions Head Lane Boca Raton Florida be investigated.

Any complaint you file, send me a copy along with who you filed it with, so we can ensure accountability, truth, and transparency.

Complaint to DOJ against Florida Police Officers not taking action and not actually investigating the crimes associated with 7020 Lions Head Lane Boca Raton.

Contact the U.S. Department of Justice

The Division of Internal Affairs Boca Raton

City of Orlando Internal Affairs

Orlando Police Headquarters
Email to

FBI Contact Information

FBI Tampa
5525 West Gray Street
Tampa, FL 33609
Phone: (813) 253-1000


PBSO Office (Local Detectives)

Boca Raton Police

More to this story at

Is Sargeant McAfee of the Palm County Sheriff really investigating the events connected to Mitch Huhem's death? Or has he simply ruled it a suicide and that's that?

New York Life Insurance Back Again, why? Whose side of this mess are you on?

Visitor Analysis & System Spec
Referring URL:
Host Name:proxy3.newyorklife.comBrowser:Chrome 49.0
IP Address: — [Label IP Address]Operating System:Win7
Location:New York, United StatesResolution:1600x900
Returning Visits:0Javascript:Enabled
Visit Length:5 mins 10 secsISP:New York Life Insurance

Navigation Path

14 Mar09:39:46
14 Mar09:40:29
14 Mar09:41:06
14 Mar09:41:22
14 Mar09:44:36
14 Mar09:44:56
Was there Life insurance on Mitch Huhem, even in the event of suicide? If so who benefited, where is the policy, who created the policy.  Got a Tip 

The Prudential Insurance Company Of America

Hey, What's your Role in all this?

Eliot Bernstein and iViewit, Archives

Eliot Bernstein Answer to Alan Rose's Filing to Create a TRUST to suit the Alleged Crimes that have already Happened.

see Alan Rose could not seem to get that Ol' New Trust created, so he Magically found an original document at 7020 Lions Head Lane, allegedly. And well Florida probate Judge, Judge John Philips said okey dokey and there ya go..

Click Below to View and Download Eliot Bernstein answer motion

Eliot Bernstein is SUING Mrachek, Fitzgerald, Rose, Konopka, Thomas and Weiss Law Firm in Florida in regard to Alan Rose's actions, YET Alan Rose DEMANDS the he not email the FIRM? WOW. And to think ALAN ROSE aggressively stated, not long ago, that he does NOT LIKE SECRETS.

"From: Eliot Ivan Bernstein []
Sent: Wednesday, August 6, 2014 4:18 PM
To: 'Alan Rose'

Subject: Response to Alan Rose - RE: SERVICE OF COURT DOCUMENT - CASE NUMBER 502012CP004391XXXXSB

Alan, after partially recovering from 5 hours of dental work on Monday and more upcoming I will respond to some of your issues below.

1.       I am suing you and each of your partners, associates of counsel and the firm in the Oppenheimer case and you are all respondents in the Estates of Shirley and Simon as well as the firm and so I am serving them as required.  

Please notify me of who will be representing each of them individually and professionally and who will be representing the firm and I can notify their counsel forward instead of them individually.  Also, will you be representing yourself Pro Se individually or professionally as a respondent in the probate cases and Oppenheimer counter?

2.       You asked me to delete the emails I sent with Ted’s email and after court the first time I did, so I could not send it back to you.

3.       I told them what to do and gave them the law and the court order.

4.       Believe what you want.

5.       I have never refused a deposition despite your repeated ranting of this false claim. I provided you the medical reason I would not be available at the time you demanded.  My medical reason for being unavailable for several weeks was filed in my extension request with the court in the Oppenheimer case and was previous to your demanded dates.  

 As those medical issues will take a few weeks as stated in my prior correspondences with you and stated I will advise you when they are over and we can schedule it then, I cannot believe that you continue to harass me claiming I am refusing knowing this.  Please stop harassing me with your deposition claims that I am refusing to take one in your attempt to build a false record that I have not cooperated with you.

 I do believe we should probably wait on production and depositions until after the motions to remove Ted as Trustee and PR that are coming up next to see if your client is qualified at this time to continue to be PR or Trustee in both Simon and Shirley’s estate and trusts due to his conflicts of interests, adverse interests, breaches of fiduciary duties and the fact that Ted and you are now sued under the Counter Complaint for breaches of fiduciary duties, malpractice and more.  In the Estate and Trust cases there are serious allegations of breaches by Ted as well.  

Therefore, I am now requesting any legal bills paid by Ted as Trustee or PR in either the estate or trusts be court approved forward and any transactions at all now be court approved prior due to the seriousness of the breach allegations in the probate cases and counter complaint and the fact that Ted is being investigated under several ongoing criminal actions and he is being sued in both state and federal civil actions for a host of torts that all relate to his continued misconduct.  

If Ted does not survive the upcoming hearings to remove him filed by both the creditor Stansbury counsel and myself, these production and deposition items will be moot, as will you be and we will save everyone from further waste and abuse of estate and trusts funds by further abuse of process by you and your client.  

I would assume Colin will remove Ted for the same reasons he did not appoint him as PR in Simon’s estate where Judge Colin prior to the hearing urged both Ted and you to withdraw Ted’s petition to become PR in Simon due to a number of relevant irrefutable reasons that he would not survive and I believe Judge Colin even threatened to sanction you and your client if the Petition was proceeded with and you lost, for at minimum the costs of everybody’s time and money you wasted in pursuing such a foolish position, similar to the almost $20k of legal fees you wasted pursuing the KIA with frivolous filings that you ended up withdrawing after similarly harassing and extorting me and my minor children with those vexatious filings. 

Thanks for the info in a, b and c.

Due to a problem in the dental work discovered on Monday, I will requires an additional procedure and the process will now take an additional 2-3 weeks from the date requested in the Oppenheimer extension filed to be complete, I will let you know of any changes and please stop bothering me until then with the request for deposition or you can take it up with the judge.


Original Posted at

Eliot Bernstein's Counter Complaint to Alan Rose's legal action to create a new trust to fit old, alleged crimes

Click Below to View or Download Complaint against Alan Rose, Ted Bernstein, Robert Spallina, Proskaur Rose, Mrachek Law Firm, Mark Manceri, Donald Tescher, and more

Hey New York Life Insurance are you involved in the millions paid out and NO Policy scandal with Jackson National Insurance ?

Visitor Analysis & System Spec
Referring URL:
Host Name:proxy3.newyorklife.comBrowser:Chrome 49.0
IP Address: — [Label IP Address]Operating System:Win7
Location:New York, United StatesResolution:1600x900
Returning Visits:0Javascript:Enabled
Visit Length:5 mins 10 secsISP:New York Life Insurance

Navigation Path

14 Mar09:39:46
14 Mar09:40:29
14 Mar09:41:06
14 Mar09:41:22
14 Mar09:44:36
14 Mar09:44:56