Thursday, July 24, 2014

JP Morgan New York

Visitor Analysis & System Spec
Search Referral:www.google.com/ (Keywords Unavailable) 
Host Name:Browser:IE 8.0
IP Address:159.53.78.143 — [Label IP Address]Operating System:Win7
Location:New York, United StatesResolution:1350x1080
Returning Visits:0Javascript:Enabled
Visit Length:15 mins 44 secsISP:Jpmorgan Chase & Co.

Navigation Path

DateTimeWebPage
  www.google.com/ (Keywords Unavailable) 
23 Jul11:34:36
  www.google.com/ (Keywords Unavailable) 
23 Jul11:39:33
  
23 Jul11:50:20

Tuesday, July 22, 2014

Alan Rose, John Pankauski and Ted Bernstein want depositions NOW, they want to PROTECT Jerry Lewin, Al Gortz, and Proskauer Rose, they want information on Eliot's children and their school, they want to BULLY and harass EVERYONE and if John won't TANGLE with ELIOT fire him, no Offense but I am not paying YOU if you won't harass ELIOT and his FAMILY, just Sayin'. They want this all in the name of closing an Estate? WHAT? Well under Absolute Privilege laws I am AGAIN sharing with you the ETHICS of Ted, John and Asshole Alan.

The eMail below now in a court case accuses me of the crime of extortion, a felony of which I have not been convicted of nor under investigation of. Ted and Alan defame and harass me and want "Privilege" and special laws to chill my speech in EXPOSING Them. I REFUSE to Submit to their illegal, unconstitutional and unethical actions.

"Ted Bernstein eMail:

"Alan - I want Eliot's deposition scheduled as soon as you can notice him.  We can discuss the strategy once he is served. I want to go through each claim with you and/or John to determine the legal necessity to respond.  If any reply is necessary, the record must be straight with respect to each.

This is a rambling, filled with contradictions that need to be exposed for what they are.  If John does not want to tangle with Eliot, remove John immediately. I am sorry to be this blunt, but I do not want to address the John issue again.

If he is not 100% in support of me as trustee, including how I have protected myself with trust assets and will continue doing so as necessary, and being aggressive and forceful, if need be, with eliot, remove him as counsel.  

I do not want to spend another unnecessary dollar with counsel that is not going to zealously defend me as trustee and protect trust assets.

I cannot be more decisive re this and I say this with no animosity - simply for efficiency sake and my best interest.

Eliot is in default of production.

Let's serve notice on him that he is in default.

I want Eliot to produce everything he has with respect to these cases, including:

Documents he refers to having that provide trusts for him and/or his children.

Agreements he has signed with my father and mother, together or separately.

All correspondence between him and my parents, together or separately concerning anything he has referenced in his ramblings through this one.

Anything and everything pertaining to iviewit, including his harassment of Jerry Lewin, Al Gortz of Proskauer and their firms.

I want court proceedings, lawsuits, all correspondence to him and from him including paper and electronic, including video tapes and electronic interviews.

History of incidents at st. Andrews school.

All correspondence with bill Stansbury. Everything related to Feaman / Stansbury

All bank accounts, credit cards, sources of income, loans and gifts.

All correspondence with anyone he has shared estate details.

All correspondence of every type with: walker, puzzio, SAHM, Diana banks, Scott banks, NACLERIO, Dietz, Gefen and every person on his email distribution list. If he doesn't comply, I want all of them deposed.

Everything in which he has mentioned my name including emails, phone calls, letters, complaints to whatever agencies he has made complaints including police, federal, state, regulatory.

Everything and anything he is doing that we are not yet aware of such as online web site attacks.

Everything connected to crystal cox concerning me and anyone else he is extorting and harassing together with her.

Manceri filed production requests. If it is possible to hand eliot a subpoena for his deposition at tomorrows hearing, that would be great. 

I also want feamans deposition taken in connection with this case and what he is doing with Eliot. 

If mediation is scheduled and you feel this is better done after the mediation, I am okay with that. If it is not, let's take his depo.

How much is in Feaman trust account that has been stolen from us? 

I want an accounting. 

Has any money been used for Stansbury defense thus far?

If we are scheduled for mediation, will this be revealed? If we are not, I want to know ASAP what is in account, I want all statements and any expenditures.

I'm sure I will think of more.

Ted Bernstein"


Source of POST, a court document, you have Absolute Privilege to repost as much as you want under Qualified Privilege and Absolute Privilege laws as this "eMail", this "Evidience" is in an official court filing.

https://docs.google.com/file/d/0Bzn2NurXrSkiM3NhakFlM1pzeTQ/edit

Alan Rose DOES not seem to GET Law, nor Care. Oh Well. Anyway Eliot Bernstein is is OWN attorney, so Ted sent an eMail to Eliot and to his attorney, ELIOT. As a matter of LAW Eliot's attorney, which in this case is himself, is entitled to and OBLIGATED to do all that is possible to protect his client, which in this case is himself. So sharing an email to protect his client, is not only his legal right, but under law he is OBLIGATED to protect his client the best he can.

I will NOT Remove the Email. The First Amendment and now "Absolute Privilege" laws protect the broadcast of this email. So Mr. Alan Rose, your wast of estate money and court time is duly noted AGAIN.

And it Lawyer, Client Privilege magically applied to this nonsense well then Eliot as his own "lawyer" has a DUTY as a matter of LAW to disclose the eMail, Period and protect his client, which in this case is himself.

The eMail did threaten "physically", gee Duh.. starving ones family and causing extreme duress is physical. Judge Colin has erred in this ruling, and it is non-sensical.

Anti-Constitutional, flat out WRONG, Judicial Order by Conflicted Judge Colin

Download, Click Below
https://drive.google.com/file/d/0Bzn2NurXrSkibVUtYkNVR1ZfbFE/edit?usp=sharing


Well Well Who have we here interested in the Ted Bernstein Report

Visitor Analysis & System Spec
Search Referral:
Host Name:pool-71-174-41-9.bstnma.east.verizon.netBrowser:Safari 5.1
IP Address:71.174.41.9 — [Label IP Address]Operating System:Win7
Location:Cambridge, Massachusetts, United StatesResolution:1024x768
Returning Visits:0Javascript:Enabled
Visit Length:Not ApplicableISP:Verizon Internet Services

Navigation Path

DateTimeWebPage
  
21 Jul03:03:54

Well Well Who have we here interested in the Ted Bernstein Report

Visitor Analysis & System Spec
Search Referral:
Host Name:pool-71-174-41-9.bstnma.east.verizon.netBrowser:Safari 5.1
IP Address:71.174.41.9 — [Label IP Address]Operating System:Win7
Location:Cambridge, Massachusetts, United StatesResolution:1024x768
Returning Visits:0Javascript:Enabled
Visit Length:Not ApplicableISP:Verizon Internet Services

Navigation Path

DateTimeWebPage
  
21 Jul03:03:54

Well Well Who have we here interested in the Ted Bernstein Report

Visitor Analysis & System Spec
Search Referral:
Host Name:pool-71-174-41-9.bstnma.east.verizon.netBrowser:Safari 5.1
IP Address:71.174.41.9 — [Label IP Address]Operating System:Win7
Location:Cambridge, Massachusetts, United StatesResolution:1024x768
Returning Visits:0Javascript:Enabled
Visit Length:Not ApplicableISP:Verizon Internet Services

Navigation Path

DateTimeWebPage
  
21 Jul03:03:54