Wednesday, June 25, 2014

Why is Alan Rose Knowingly, Willfully, Bullying Eliot Bernstein and holding up Legal Process in this Estate Case? How is Alan Rose SO SURE that he is above the law? Alan Rose is So Whiny, Petty and Unprofessional.

"
From: Eliot Ivan Bernstein [mailto:iviewit@iviewit.tv]
Sent: Wednesday, June 25, 2014 4:37 AM
To: Benjamin P. Brown (bbrown@matbrolaw.com)

Subject: Objection to IRA changes at this time

Ben,

Briefly, my objection to the IRA accounts being rolled over into new accounts is that we have already alleged that millions of dollars may have been taken from the IRA’s inappropriately through fraud and therefore I do not want the accounts to be changed at all until investigation and auditing of the current and past IRA’s can be closely and forensically investigated.

I would suggest that until this is complete no one make any changes to the accounts where records could be lost in the shuffle, agents changed and documents then lost (as you know we have a repeated problem with lost and missing documents already).

Therefore, to preserve evidence I think it is best that until we have ALL the information regarding both my mother and father’s current accounts we sit tight and make no changes that could be construed as part of a further fraud.

Please attach this email to any pleading regarding the IRA to Judge Colin, I do not think he understood that we have already alleged that millions are missing and the records have not been tendered and that this could be a huge can of worms that all evidence should be preserved as is.  

Have you received the account information that you requested yet and have you contacted Chris Prindle for information regarding the missing beneficiaries?  Eliot

Eliot I. Bernstein"


From: Eliot Ivan Bernstein [mailto:iviewit@iviewit.tv]
Sent: Wednesday, June 25, 2014 11:06 AM
To: 'Alan Rose'; 'Ben Brown'

Subject: RE: Bernstein - letter from Ben Brown

Alan, thank you for the compliment, the estate administration under my care would not have fraudulent documents, forgeries, altered estate and trust documents and would have preserved my parents' intents.

Under you, Tescher, Spallina, Mancerie et al. it is fraught with fraud and crimes and this is
what is costing everyone a fortune, until of course we recover them from you in damages in all current and future actions against you for your part in advancing these frauds.

Your attempt to spin these costs as a burden I have caused is laughable but good evidence for future actions against you, which will prove that ALL these costs are due to you and those that engaged you.

Ben, please include this email to Judge Colin as well.  Eliot"


From: Eliot Ivan Bernstein [mailto:iviewit@iviewit.tv]
Sent: Wednesday, June 25, 2014 6:57 PM
To: 'Alan Rose'; 'Peter M. Feaman'; 'Ben Brown'; 'Linda McDaniel'; 'bill@palmettobaylaw.com'; 'john@jmorrisseylaw.com'; 'David Simon'; 'tbernstein@lifeinsuranceconcepts.com'; 'John Pankauski'; 'Irwin Block'; 'Donald Tescher'

Subject: RE: SERVICE OF COURT DOCUMENT Fifteenth Judicial Circuit Case # 502012CP004391XXXXSB - Notice of Hearing


Alan, I did not say you usurped my hearing time but you seem to get so much wrong it is hard to keep up with, I stated clearly that you materially changed the motions that were to be heard that day of mine to what you wanted and no one agreed on, including Colin, who repeated he wanted to hear my motions, especially that one you particularly fear, the motion for construction of…  that you have now tried to erase twice and replace and we keep having to go round in circles while you waste more monies and time of everyone’s.

I am not sure what to do here as Sherrie Norton is the one who advised us to pick the date of the two she offered and schedule the hearing as he would want to hear this personally, especially when she heard that the motions she scheduled with Candice were being substantively changed.

Perhaps you can attend teleconference, if not you can call over there to Colin’s office and get some ideas for a change.

We can always add your motion to have Ted PR to my list, after the motions to remove you and then him are heard.

I am not willing to change any of my other scheduled motions for my hearing date.  Let me know your decision or I can call Sherrie again and please stop the personal harassments of me and trying to have people coerce me to do what you want.  

If you agree to have the terms above, my Motions as so stated in the Notice of Hearing and your one for Ted as PR, we can probably save everyone time and effort from your further delays and games.  I would then prepare the Notice of Hearing properly and with integrity.  I will be asking for sanctions and fees for your misguided efforts to change my hearing for the second time.  Best ~ Eliot


From: Alan Rose [mailto:ARose@mrachek-law.com]
Sent: Wednesday, June 25, 2014 6:42 PM
To: Peter M. Feaman; Eliot Ivan Bernstein; Ben Brown; Linda McDaniel; bill@palmettobaylaw.com; john@jmorrisseylaw.com; David Simon; tbernstein@lifeinsuranceconcepts.com; John Pankauski; Irwin Block; Donald Tescher
Subject: FW: SERVICE OF COURT DOCUMENT Fifteenth Judicial Circuit Case # 502012CP004391XXXXSB - Notice of Hearing

I am not available for this hearing (I have advised everyone of this by email) and object to (i) the short notice and (ii) the fact that we would need one.

No one usurped Eliot’s hearing time.  Its about time the people Eliot seems to trust, Ben Brown and Peter Feaman/Jeff Royer, put a stop to this endless game.

I asked for a status conference and thought everyone agreed, and Eliot advised that he did not realize what I had asked for.  So, I withdrew that and we all went back to the Court.  No one tricked Eliot.

At the hearing, Judge Colin said he wanted to do the PR motions first, and would entertain other motions or do a status conference on other motions.

This week, Judge Colin added the motion to disqualify Ted’s counsel to that list, because it must be decided first.

There is no need for this hearing, and I cannot attend in any event.
 
    Alan B. Rose, Esq."


"
-----Original Message-----
From: Eliot Ivan Bernstein [mailto:iviewit@iviewit.tv]
Sent: Wednesday, June 25, 2014 11:06 AM
To: 'Alan Rose'; 'Ben Brown'

Subject: RE: Bernstein - letter from Ben Brown

Alan, thank you for the compliment, the estate administration under my care would not have fraudulent documents, forgeries, altered estate and trust documents and would have preserved my parents' intents.  
Under you, Tescher, Spallina, Mancerie et al. it is fraught with fraud and crimes and this is what is costing everyone a fortune, until of course we recover them from you in damages in all current and future actions against you for your part in advancing these frauds.

Your attempt to spin these costs as a burden I have caused is laughable but good evidence for future actions against you, which will prove that ALL these costs are due to you and those that engaged you.

Ben, please include this email to Judge Colin as well.  Eliot

-----Original Message-----
From: Alan Rose [mailto:ARose@mrachek-law.com]
Sent: Wednesday, June 25, 2014 10:10 AM
To: Alan Rose
Cc: Ben Brown; Eliot Ivan Bernstein; Linda McDaniel; John Pankauski;
bill@palmettobaylaw.com; Peter M. Feaman; john@jmorrisseylaw.com;
tbernstein@lifeinsuranceconcepts.com

Subject: Re: Bernstein - letter from Ben Brown

Do what you think is best.

But I do think we will all see what estate administration would look like
under an Eliot PR-ship.

Alan B. Rose
Mrachek, Fitzgerald, Rose, Konopka, Thomas & Weiss, P.A.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.